I've decided to start publishing all of my lessons before I teach them. A little odd, I know, but there is a reason for this.
I recently decided that I would write a textbook for a creative writing class I've been teaching for the past four years. I figure, there are a ton of people out there who are writing books on education with close to the same number of years in the profession. I also figured, seeing as I have a Doctorate in Education, and over 14 years experience in the profession, I can rely on my credentials a little and man up to write a book.
Here's where the problem sets in. When I began writing curriculum for my district, I didn't think far enough in the future. I never thought about the fact that . . .
ALL MY WORK BELONGS TO THE SCHOOL!!
True story. It doesn't matter if you have created it on your own time sitting on your couch at home. If it was used in a classroom, it belongs to the school.
Check out what the
NEA says about
Intellectual Property.
Thus this blog . . .
The importance of intellectual property
I was talking to my ex-union president about our current contract, and he was adamant that whatever was done on school grounds, during the day belongs to the school. Additionally, any work done at home to prepare for the school day is considered "work for hire" and belongs to the school. The only way around it would be publish the lesson before you know if it's effective.
The idea of publishing something that I don't know works before I try it gets under my skin. That, and it's kinda the worst possible way to improve the image of the profession.
"Hey everyone! Here's something that I've never tried before and I have no clue if it will work off of the paper." Sounds like a great slogan for getting people to trust and respect your work as a professional. I mean, come on, it's not like teachers are looked down upon by almost every political body or anything.
On top of that, teachers who use modeling (an effective and encouraged educational strategy) get kinda screwed over if they're modeling some creative task. Think of the art teacher modeling painting strategies, that art now belongs to the school. Or the music composition teacher teaching how to develop an original melody, that melody now belongs to the school. Or in my case, a creative writing teacher who creates a short story modeling proper characterization or dialogue, that story now belongs to the school. As a
writer and
creator, I find that fact unacceptable.
What to do?
I'm not sure how your contract is written, but I know mine has nothing in there to protect the intellectual properties of teachers. I want that changed.
While my district seems willing to work with me so I can get my rights to the curriculum and lessons I've developed back, not all districts and administrations will be so kind to their people. Still though, the idea of not owning my own materials and ideas is unacceptable to me. I will be working with my union to try and get wording into the contract that protects the intellectual property rights of teachers for the future.
I'd recommend that you do the same . . .